Open records bill signing misses key ingredient
3:30 pm, April 17th, 2012
The bill overhauling the state’s open government laws ran into a final snag on Tuesday—but it had nothing to do with the competing interests of the news media and local governments who fought over the measure.
Gov. Nathan Deal was set to sign the bill today at an Atlanta Press Club luncheon, flanked by the two men who spearheaded the legislation, state Attorney General Sam Olens and Rep. Jay Powell, R-Camilla. But no one remembered to bring a copy of the bill.
Deal, Olens and Powell pretended to sign the bill for the cameras (and he performed the deed later in the day, according to a release from his office.)
The hiccup didn’t stop the governor from praising bipartisan effort and stakeholder cooperation, including input from a number of First Amendment lawyers, that led to the General Assembly’s passage of House Bill 397 last month.
Deal himself had a hand in the legislation. He pushed for a new exemption that would restrict public access to records pertaining to large scale state economic development projects that involved the expenditure of $25 million or more until the state had a commitment in place. Deal said the exemption would prevent Georgia from being “victimized by competitors or other states” who might use Georgia’s Open Records Act to gain information about budding projects in advance and trump Georgia’s bids.
During his speech, Deal focused on the three main pillars of his legislative agenda last session: education, tax reform and criminal justice reform.
He said his office has worked hard to make Georgia “the number one place in the nation to do business.” But to fully realize that ideal, the state will have to address many of its ills, which Deal said stem from lack of employment.
Deal also answered a question from the Daily Report about the record number of judicial appointments he has made in his term compared to other recent governors. (Currently, there are two vacancies in the Enotah Judicial Circuit that arose after judges resigned in the wake of investigations by the Judicial Qualifications Commission for alleged misconduct.)
“I’ve been surprised by it,” Deal said. “I don’t know the reason for it. I think part of it is the increasing scrutiny about what is happening on the bench in our state, and it’s unfortunate when that is the reason behind the vacancies. And I think some of it there have been individuals who have served for a long time and are tired and ready to retire.”





